Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Don’t be so Literal! Tell it Slant.

Emily Dickinson wrote: Tell all the Truth but Tell it Slant.  This is usually interpreted to mean that truth can be so shattering it should be revealed gently…however that doesn’t make much sense to me…and I hate it when a salesman dances around telling you the price of something because he wants to soften you up! Or even worse, when the doctor says “D’you want the bad news or the good news?”

The idea that the Truth of something is to be seen by examining it in many different ways, not necessarily head on, is a much more interesting.  Therefore when I want to make a piece about a particular memory or scene I try to think of all the different ways that memory or landscape intrigued me.   I don’t want to make a quilt that is a full frontal photograph relating every minute literal biological detail…I want to show the complexity of form, or the twisted pipes, or the glowing viridian green.  I want to look at the idea from every angle I can, I want to slant myself around it!!!

One of the reasons that some major art quilters automatically dismiss representational pieces is because the maker has put too many mind boggling pettifogging annoying proliferating obfuscating redundant twiddly bits into it! If the work is based on a real place or object then it isn’t necessarily weak – it’s all in the telling of the tale.    I want to defend the poor old representational art quilt because I think often the abstract piece is preferred simply because it is abstract.  And I’ve seen some bloody awful knock off abstracts get into shows.  It’s harder in a way to make a good representational piece, it’s so easy to become too literal, or sentimental  or trite.  These approaches have to be avoided very consciously but it can be done if you’re aware of why you are making the piece.

If it was the colour and verticality of a place that struck you dumb, then reveal those!!! But you don’t have to include everything else.    If it was a sense of height, but the actual colour was immaterial, then think what colour  (or lack thereof) might give that sense of height.  D’you know I practically have to fight with some people to prevent them from using “ that green fabric the  exact shade the grass is in the photo”!!  Oh no you don’t!!  At least not unless it was that shade that just grabbed your heart and soul!!

Of course this is exactly what the Impressionists were doing. It’s wonderful to look at some of their paintings and see their Slant on Truth!   Monet. Yes! the light, the light!  Or Picasso,  I like this angle of the lady, or would that angle be better, and what about those boobs??!! Let’s put it all in…and nothing else!

So…tell the Truth, but the Truth that is in your mind, your own reaction to the scene, your sideways, upside down, inside out view of it…then I think the piece will be fresh and real and wonderful.  And now, I’ll go and try and follow my own advice!  Or maybe, make a nice cup of tea…..If you have been, thanks for reading!

Elizabeth

Monday, September 28, 2009

Rejected? So what can you DO about it?

I noticed some discussion on the ‘net about rejections from shows and I started thinking about what you can do….not what you feel. Of course one thing you can do is use those unwanted missives as wallpaper: I had a friend who papered her loo with them!! She had some great ones, interesting reading while sitting on the throne!
So, what to do when the slim envelope arrives? While there seems to be some agreement that you shouldn’t worry about being rejected… I think you should worry! At least in so far as worry might lead you to figure out why you were rejected.

Let’s look at possible reasons for rejection and the actions you could take as a result.

  1. Volume. Too many good pieces were entered for the jurors to accept all of them –the jurors’ statements (read carefully!) often indicate this. If your chances of getting in are 1 in 5 or less then volume is at least part of the reason the piece didn’t get in. Now you’ve got three options: enter less popular shows, make better work so you really stand out, or enter more shows! But don’t let the Gambler’s Fallacy catch you out! Don’t assume that just because you enter a show 10 times you’ll have a ten times greater chance of getting in!!! Would it were so!!
  2. Fit. You may have entered a show where they were looking for different kind of work. Always read carefully what they are looking for, and, if you can, look over previous acceptances to that particular show and any statements the juror(s) made about the instructions they were given. Seek a show that fits your work, or (if it’s important to you) make your work to fit a particular show.
  3. Photography. Was your work presented as well as it might have been? This is a difficult one for many of us without easy access to affordable photography – look for the best solution you can. Jurors continually describe throwing out a significant number of entries because of poor photography. My solution was to get a good support wall and the flood lights and then look for a friend with a great camera.
  4. Value and subtlety. Certain types of work, very subtle work or soft mid value colours simply aren’t going to stand out well in a photograph. If you want to get into a particular show make and enter work that photographs well. And make your detail shots really work for you.
  5. The Jurors. There is no doubt that jurors have biases. If you talk to them and they are honest you usually hear that they agreed immediately on about 10-20% of the work as being great. They also agree on the work that definitely does not meet requirements. That leaves a huge grey area in the middle where bias is going to work. Consciously or unconsciously!! Some jurors respond to bright colours, others to very graphic bold work, others to more innovative pieces, others prefer abstract and hate anything representational. One person who has been a juror said to me “your work is good for what it is, but I hate that kind of work!” So if I see she’s a solo juror, I know my chances are going to be slim and I can choose to enter or not with that in mind.
  6. Choice of entered pieces. There is definitely a consensus that entering 3 pieces that are related is going to have much more impact than 3 totally unrelated pieces, or a single piece. There’s a show I currently wish to enter – I had 2 related pieces that I think will appeal to the particular jurors, but I needed a third. Guess what I’ve been making? (night and day!!)
  7. Quality. Is your work as strong as the standard the show accepts? Go and see the show, look at the catalogues, look at successful people’s websites – most accepted pieces can now be found on a website or blog. Take a long hard look – is your piece as good as theirs? This is particularly important if your work is not very innovative (which is fine – it just means you have to work harder because there’s more competition!). If it’s not as strong, why not? What does your piece lack that the other piece has? Don’t just give in and say, “it’s no good, I’m crap!” That’s a poor excuse. Research has shown many times that it is the amount of time and effort you put into learning your trade/craft/skill etc that really makes the difference. Pure innate talent plays only a small part. While, luck and networking are important in business and politics, in the art quilt world (thank goodness! they feature little. So, think! And Make Work.
  8. Enter More Shows. "making more work is what makes you better and if entering shows gets you to make more work, then you should enter a lot! Your quilts will get better. I guarantee it!" Carol Taylor
  9. The X factor: there are always those mystery decisions that will forever puzzle us:

wherebongtreesgrow

I still can’t understand why the same show rejected one of my best pieces (Where Bong Trees Grow, see left) and, in a different year, accepted something very weak!!! However, both are now long gone…and I never look back!

Please comment on any other reasons (and solutions) that you think are pertinent! I’ll revise the blog and add them (with attribution!).

And, if you have been, thanks for reading! Elizabeth

Friday, September 25, 2009

The Perfect Artist and the Secondary Easel

I used to long for the day when everything I made turned out exactly as I had hoped!  I felt sure that this would be the benchmark from which point I could finally think of myself as an “artist”.  An artist is someone who sits down and makes something perfect and beautiful Every Time!!!

Then of course I started reading about Real Artists and discovered that the only ones who think they they make perfect work every time are fooling themselves!!

I was very interested, therefore, by Robert Genn’s newsletter (which I thoroughly recommend) this morning as he wrote about established artists being extremely critical of their work.  He feels that they do this as part of a quality control check.  Artists who don’t look at their work in this way may be deluded!!  He talks about a primary easel and a secondary easel.  I like this idea…I think if one has the space it would be good to have a Design Wall where you allow yourself freedom to follow your sketch and/or deviate as the piece evolves and “what if” ideas spring to mind.    But then you should also have a “Critique Wall” where you examine the piece closely to spot the strong areas and the weak areas, literally saying What is Strong….and what is Weak?   I have a rough checklist on my secondary wall on which I have pinned up questions like “does it hang together?, is everything part of the whole?, is there excitement  -  mystery??  can I get rid of anything? ”etc.  If I read a critical review in an art magazine I look for further questions I could ask about on ongoing piece.  >                                                                       
>Being an artist means thinking, imagining, making and Improving.
I hope to never let a piece go without thinking how I could improve it – sometimes my improvement ideas are so radical that they can’t be accomplished within the piece, though I have been so drastic as to dump the whole lot in a dye bath, or to cut a piece up into six long columns and rearrange them, or to cut out all the weak areas and end up with something just one sixth of its former size!!!     What can be improved?  What cannot?  Before I’ve even finished the first piece, if I’m thinking how I could have made that piece better, or differently….I set to work on the next piece…as a result I am usually working on at least 3 pieces at once.

So before I completely finish a piece, before everything is totally done, I submit it to The Critique Wall.   There are usually a lot of changes at this point.  After it’s finished, I hang it in my living room until another piece is done.  This could be weeks, or even months.  The day to day living with the piece is the best test of all – does the quilt look fresh and satisfying Every Day??? or does one awkward element become more and more obvious?
It’s fascinating how the good bits become better and the weak bits become worse as it matures!!!  Just like people!                                  
                                                          
Lest we despair that we’ll never become really good, Robert Genn reminds us of Thomas Merton’s thoughts: 

  "Paradoxically, I have found peace because I have always been  dissatisfied. My moments of depression and despair turn out to be  renewals, new beginnings. ...  this dissatisfaction which sometimes used to worry me ….. has helped me  to move  freely and even gaily with the stream of life."     

And, if you have been, thanks for reading!  Elizabeth

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Georgia: a great place to dye!

So , yesterday I decided to have a few friends (Cleo, Deb and Terry)  over for a last dyeing day of summer!  Deb brought some soy wax and some gentleman’s shaving brushes and we all lathered up!!!   don’t have my “experiment” washed out yet…maybe later!! check back!IMG_1756 It’s always fun to watch how other people play…even more so to be invited to join in!

 

 

 

I reckon I must have been thinking about

IMG_1723

the beach as I dye painted this length of fabric!!!

It’s been a good summer!

And now to figure out how to use my fabric thoughtfully!!

If you have been, thanks for reading!   Elizabeth

Monday, September 21, 2009

How d’you make the boring, interesting?

I’m always intrigued when I see a picture of the actual scene that an artist has used as inspiration.  It’s amazing how a how good artist can make something quite mundane, even boring, into an exciting piece.  So, how do they do that?   When I visit an art gallery I first of all choose my favorite pieces – the three (or so) I want to take home with me.  You never know One Lucky Person might be invited to do that one day!!   I walk around muttering to myself, and laughing at how astonished I will be when the head Curator comes up and says “OK, take your pick!”…..usually I’m being trailed by at least one guard at this point!    Having chosen my pieces, I revisit each one to figure out how that artist has caught my attention.    What did they actually do that created my slobbering, muttering acquisitive desire?

The first thing is usually colour….either the intensity is great, or the contrast remarkable, or the combination irresistible.       april 09 spring bar h, NYC,wc 027

There’s a painting by Larry Rivers in the Brooklyn museum (detail to the left) that has a certain yellow green that always draws me in.  You could sell me anything this colour  - I find it so evocative and refreshing.  This colour scheme would be a great starting point for a piece for me.   I love it so much I can taste it!

 

 

The second thing that these artists do is omit anything boring and unnecessary.

okeefeblackdoorsnow

Everything in a piece should be important…if all the important stuff is in, then the rest can just be a beautifully hazy background…I have to remind myself of this constantly!!  I don’t want to see every window in the house, or every pane of every window – if the important thing is the way the windows reflect the light, then that’s all I want to see.  I love the spareness of some of Georgia O’Keefe’s watercolours (see right), or Arthur Dove’s…because they show you only the key elements.  the pattern of the snowflakes against the door and side wall of the house says it all.  Interestingly, I noticed they used this same idea in one of the scenes in the Lifetime Georgia O’Keefe film on Saturday night!

 

The third thing, I notice is that the artist will increase the contrast (from the original scene)…scan a picture of a quilt you made into Photoshop.  Now increase the contrast…(Image, Adjust, Brightness/contrast)….doesn’t it make it more vibrant?  Now, print out those pictures and put them up on your design wall to remind you!!

barton cityofwillows detail

photoshopped

april 09 spring bar h, NYC,wc 002

contrast

 

 

 

 

 

Also in the photo above (the Botanical Gardens in Athens, GA)….one would want to omit the poles on the left….they are an annoying feature irrelevant to the scene. 

The paintings or quilts that make a boring scene interesting also work by pulling out interesting shapes from the scene.  If the tree is a little awkward, improve it!!  If the shadow plus the edge of the house makes an interesting shape exaggerate it.  This is something that Morandi does with his bottles – if you notice they never stand like soldiers on parade but make interesting curving shapes within and between themselves.

If I was making a landscape quilt from the photo above I would pull out some of the curves that lead toward that dark corner…which would also serve to lead me into the garden.

I’m also always drawn into a piece that has depth and mystery…I like to be invited to enter the piece…like Alice climbing up onto the mantelpiece to get through the mirror!

So!! today….off to the nearest gallery or museum!  Then (avoiding those guards!) choose the pieces you want to take home and analyze just how the artist encouraged you to crime! Remember, you can steal the techniques even if you can’t steal the picture!

If you have been, thanks for reading!  Elizabeth

Friday, September 18, 2009

sometimes ah cogitates…

and sometimes ah actually does something!
These last two weeks I’ve been framing up some watercolours for a show at a local Athens (GA) gallery: Aurum on Clayton.  I began  watercolour painting  in order to learn more about such theoretical concepts as composition, and colour theory…but then got seduced by the medium itself.  It’s such a different way of working from quilts.  Although like watercolour, with quilts you do work in stages: background, middle ground, foreground etc…unlike watercolour, where it is close to impossible to move or change anything, with a quilt you can try this, try that, and the other…ad infinitum…well to the limits of one’s patience and fabric stack at least! 
Watercolours are more like acting in a stage play, quilts more like making a film.  In a play you have one shot at the performance and it’s bad or good – but the next day you get another try at it (assuming the play isn’t taken off!).  With a film,  you can cut out the good bits and stitch them together taking scenes that aren’t quite right and so on.
So for me,  watercolour painting has been a great change of pace ……and you do learn about composition and color and all those things.  Plus,  if you don’t get it right, you’ve got another shot the next day.  And there are lots of luscious books and lots of advice available.
So here are a few of my watercolours – I apologize for the photography, I nearly always didn’t remember to take the picture until I’d got the frame and the glass on!
aurm 4 inverie, knoydart aurum 2 lighthouse, Mull aurum 1 iona 1
aurum 5 north beach, ionaaurum 11 rocky shore aurum 8 sky over knoydart 
 aurum 6 marsh aurum 7 sunset over purple mountain aurum 9 across the pond
Most of them are based on studies/photographs from my trip to Scotland in the spring.
I’m also going to show some quilts – I’ve now made 3 based on a local  unused factory:
cement works IMG_1754
I really enjoy giving myself the challenge of doing several pieces based on the same image – that’s something I’ve learned from trying watercolour…have another go at it…see what else you can make of it!
The opening at Aurum Gallery is October 8th, 5.30-8.30 – I know the wine, nibblies and company will be good!!  See you there! 
And, if you have been, thanks for reading.   Elizabeth

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Self evaluation

Some people are lucky enough to be in a critique group, but most of us have to try to evaluate our own work. Though I’m not too sure about the value of critique groups anyway since I recently heard of one that had to be disbanded because everyone was too nice!! they would never truly criticize another’s work! So how and when d’you stand back and critique what you’ve done?

The creative phase
I don’t think you can create and critique simultaneously – they’re two very different activities and we know from recent studies that multi-tasking isn’t something the brain actually does. We switch rapidly from one activity to another rather than doing them at the same time. People with ADHD probably switch faster than others and so may seem as if they can multi-task more easily!! When you’re creating you want to open your mind to possibilities, to trying all the “what if”s and “how if I….”s and “I wonder about…” . I think it’s good at this stage to capture those ideas…but not to evaluate them. How to capture them? well you can make a “note to self” - if I start springing out different possibilities, I’ll write on scraps of paper and attach them to the design wall – “try cutting in two”, or “work upside down” or “reverse values”….or if I’m trying out different pieces of fabric I drop them into one pile – never put fabric away while you’re working on a piece!!! For one thing if you find yourself tidying up when you‘re supposed to be building the piece, you’re actually engaged in displacement activity!! there’s a problem and you’re avoiding trying to solve it! Another way to capture the different ideas is to photograph the different possibilities as you go along. I must admit I use the camera, the scanner, Photoshop and the computer a great deal when designing a piece.

The evaluation phase
So when the creativity has yielded a something on the design wall, there comes a time to stand back and evaluate. A good time, I think, is the next morning…give yourself time away from the piece and then come back and try to look at it with fresh eyes. How does it look? Does it fit the idea you wanted to communicate? some people don’t begin with an idea ( I find it hard to do that!) but at some point there must be something that begins to emerge…if not, frankly I would ask myself does this piece actually have any point?
Look at the piece in a mirror – that helps to give distance…two mirrors at angles gives even more distance! photographing and looking at it on the computer gives distance…looking from a distance too!

It’s not easy to critique the piece…and I think that’s why people often avoid it. They fear that they may have done “all this for nothing”…not so!!! With everything you do, something is learned. I used to say to my kids “not a mistake, a learning opportunity!” (Oh, Mom don’t act the psychologist with us!). If you’re engaged in displacement activities like tidying up, making a cup of tea, checking emails etc, ask yourself what you’re doing?!! Instead of telling yourself how much work has gone into it so far that can’t be undone, or that you’ve already cut into a special piece of fabric, or that it’s the size you had in mind and can’t be changed, that you have to finish it by Thursday and that allows for no alterations, that you really like the top right hand corner and nothing’s going to shift that! that you’ve spent several days piecing together the middle section and you don’t want that time wasted, that you can’t consider using navy blue fabric because you don’t have any…..steel yourself to the task of cold clear critique. I think the two main questions are: Does it communicate? Does it work as a composition?

And how d’you answer those questions? I always do listen to gut reaction at first – though I know I’m one of those people who tends to hate everything they do until weeks or months later and then I think, hmm that wasn’t too bad… alternatively some people’s guts are friendlier than mine and they tell them everything is ok when it’s not. so I think a little more thoughtful analysis is more helpful than just the gut. It’s not always the site of your clearest thoughts! Move up the body and get another organ engaged in the process!! preferably the one on top! Now is the time for all good artists to get the left brain in gear.

Does it communicate? To answer that question look to the original idea – if it was “fresh, glowing tomatoes tumbling from a basket”…is that what you’ve got? If it was “the serenity of the hills” – are your lines serene? What is a serene line in fact? How would you define it? If your idea was much more abstract e.g. “the beauty of lines crossing in harmony”…then can that be seen?

Does it work? When I first began to try to make art I was very puzzled by this question. I had no idea what it meant. Did the question mean did the piece actually go? or Work as what? Now I think that the phrase actually should be: Does it work as a composition with all that we want a composition to be. Phrasing is that way is a lot more helpful because there are many books out there giving guidance as to what a composition should be, what attributes it should have etc. And you can even take workshops on it!! (I’m giving one at the end of October at Hudson River Valley addressing these exact points (plus (I’m told!) amazing food!)).

Imagine your favorite teacher critiqueing the piece - what might he/she notice? Imagine the most critical person you know looking at it, and how would they respond? Always remember that they're talking about the work, not about you!

So now instead of gazing vaguely at the piece and wondering about it, do the hard work of going through the steps – does it have this, and that..does it do this and that (balance, harmony, tension etc). Be willing to do this, even though it’s irksome and even though it means you might have to abandon a section of the piece. without this, no real progress can be made. And like you, the main thing I want is to improve. So I must clearly see what needs improvement – and act!

If you have been, thanks for reading!! sorry about the rant!! Go forth, create and then evaluate!! Elizabeth.